The two lost notes on page 54 of Ramanujan's lost notebook
On page 54 Ramanujan wrote "see note" after A³ − B³ (Entry 8.2.1) and after A³ + B³ (Entry 8.2.2); both notes are lost. Both missing identities are special cases of his cubic circular summation (Entry 8.2.3) on the same page, with the Borweins' cubic theta function a(q) = Σm,n qm²+mn+n². Everything below is computed in your browser. self-test …
1. The two missing identities, coefficient by coefficient
Exact integer arithmetic on power series, f(a,b) = Σ an(n+1)/2bn(n−1)/2 summed directly; no division, no floating point. Sections 2–3 use floating point, with f(a,b) from the Jacobi triple product (−a;ab)∞(−b;ab)∞(ab;ab)∞ and a(q) from its double sum.
2. Evaluate both sides at a number q
3. Ramanujan's circular summation (Entry 8.2.3) for any a, b
The presets use the q of section 2. In the paper the brace of Entry 8.2.3 is rewritten as a(q) through a³ = b³ + c³ (Borweins).
4. Why a note was needed: the product obstruction
Every integer series 1 + … is uniquely ∏(1 − qⁿ)−cₙ. It is a (generalized) eta-quotient, i.e. a finite product of theta functions, exactly when (cₙ) is periodic. The recorded cube identities have a periodic quadratic cofactor; the two lost ones do not.
Paper, programs and citation: doi:10.5281/zenodo.23030496 · source code · paper page · Otakhon U. Kenjaev, 2026.